Best advice: use that or which or nothing, depending on what your ear tells you. Then, when writing for certain publications, know that you may have to replace a good many whiches with thats, and perhaps a that or two with a which, to conform to the “rule” almost no one follows perfectly in other than Edited English and few can follow perfectly even there.
hey..
people..are u discussing which adaptations were lousy or the word lousy itself?…please refrain from changing the topic..and discuss whats neccesary.
Comments:
Is it bad to say, “All of them?”
Amanda, that’s pretty strong language for you!
You’re right. I should be more careful.
Books-turned-movies which are lousy seems less powerful though.
BTW, should it be which are lousy or that are lousy?
Per the Columbia Guide to Standard English (which I love), it should be “Books-turned-movies that are lousy.”
Rachel! Thank you so much!
Giles is correct… I don’t think any book I have read was ever upstaged by the movie. Just the opposite.
Is “lousy” still considered slang?
There are a few that can be considered just as good or better, I think.
lousy
adj 1: very bad; “a lousy play”; “it’s a stinking world” [syn: icky, crappy, rotten, shitty, stinking, stinky] 2: infested with lice; “burned their lousy clothes” 3: vile; despicable; “a dirty (or lousy) trick”; “a filthy traitor” [syn: dirty, filthy]
I don’t think it’s slang. This is from the wonderful Dictionary.com
There are a few that can be considered just as good or better, I think.
lousy
adj 1: very bad; “a lousy play”; “it’s a stinking world” [syn: icky, crappy, rotten, shitty, stinking, stinky] 2: infested with lice; “burned their lousy clothes” 3: vile; despicable; “a dirty (or lousy) trick”; “a filthy traitor” [syn: dirty, filthy]
I don’t think it’s slang. This is from the wonderful Dictionary.com
hey..
people..are u discussing which adaptations were lousy or the word lousy itself?…please refrain from changing the topic..and discuss whats neccesary.